Analog mastering

Analog vs. "In The Box"

Mastering is the final stage of music production—the one that shapes the final sound before distribution. Two main approaches face off: analog mastering, known for its legendary warmth and character, and "In The Box" (ITB) mastering, done entirely in the digital realm using plugins and software.

Analog Mastering relies on physical gear: passive equalizers, tube compressors, magnetic tape.

Advantages:

• Unique character: Each machine has its own sonic signature, adding a distinctive touch.

Disadvantages:

• High cost: A quality analog setup is a significant investment.

• Maintenance and wear: Machines require regular upkeep and recalibration.

• Less flexibility: Adjustments take more time and are less precise than in digital.

(Photo of Studio 2 at SodaSound during my last session)

💻 "In The Box" Mastering: Digital Precision

ITB mastering is done entirely within a DAW using increasingly powerful plugins that accurately emulate analog hardware.

Advantages:

• Total flexibility: Everything can be undone, modified, and automated at will.

• Lower cost: No need for expensive hardware—a good computer and plugins are enough.

• Perfect repeatability: An ITB project can be reopened months later with exactly the same settings.

Disadvantages:

• Latency and artifacts: Digital processing can introduce pre-ringing or other artifacts if not handled carefully.

So, who wins?

There’s no universal answer. It depends on the music style, workflow, and budget. Some engineers combine both approaches to get the best of both worlds: precise corrections in digital, followed by analog hardware for final coloration.

In a world where digital technology is rapidly advancing, ITB mastering is becoming increasingly powerful. But for purists and analog sound lovers, nothing will ever replace the magic of circuits and tubes.

At White Mastering, I use highly advanced plugins.